Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is better than the Galaxy M30s's global score of 83.3. Both phones we are comparing use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot heavier than the Galaxy M30s, it's extremely thinner and newer.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little better processing power than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M30s and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a higher 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy M30s captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, slower video frame rates and a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M30s features greater battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.