Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy M30s's overall score of 83.3. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is newer and extremely thinner than the Galaxy M30s's, although it's also extremely heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little better screen density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments and a much more MP back-facing camera. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 36 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.