Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s has an overall score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's overall score of 81.1. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy M30s has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy M30s is a lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but both of them are 0.35inches thick.
Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as the Galaxy M30s one, both of them have a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy M30s has greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.