Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 is much better than Moto G Power, having a overall score of 86.5 against 76.1. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. The Galaxy M31 is a just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than Moto G Power, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
The Galaxy M31 features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy M31 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a bit sharper display than Moto G Power, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy M31 features a much better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Motorola Moto G Power's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the Galaxy M31 one, both of them have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and equal 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M31 has improved battery life than Moto G Power, because it has a 20% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.