Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, getting an 86.5 score against 86.2. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. Galaxy M31's design has the same thickness than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, but it's a little lighter.
The Galaxy M31 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Moto G200 5G has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a little bit better camera than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photography. Galaxy M31 features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M31 has superior battery duration than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has a 20% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.