Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a global score of 86.5, which is better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 global score. Samsung Galaxy M31 is a newer cellphone than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy M31 has a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy M31 has a very superior camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same aperture, the Galaxy M31 also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy M31, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M31 counts with a much better battery life than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.