Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-06 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a general score of 88, which is much better than HTC U Ultra's 77 score. Samsung Galaxy M31s's construction is a lot newer than the HTC U Ultra's, although it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy M31s has just a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better pixels quantity in each inch of screen. The HTC U Ultra has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M31s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M31s features a superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy M31s takes much better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy M31s also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.