Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-06 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s is a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, with an 88 score against 82.7. Samsung Galaxy M31s is a newer cellphone than the LG G8X ThinQ, although it is just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M31s has 11 version and LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Galaxy M31s. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M31s, although it has a little lower pixel density, a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M31s has a really longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy M31s captures better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.