Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s has an overall score of 88, which is a bit better than LG K92's 85.4 global score. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Galaxy M31s's construction is just a little heavier and somewhat thicker than LG K92. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M31s has a more recent 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy M31s features a bit sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a little bit greater pixel amount in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy M31s has a little faster processor than LG K92. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy M31s takes clearer videos and photos than LG K92, and although they both have a back camera with a 64 megapixels resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M31s also has a bigger sensor. LG K92 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a much longer battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.