Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Mirror black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s is better than the LG Q70, having a score of 88 against 77.9. Despite being the best device we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy M31s's construction is somewhat thicker and a little heavier than the LG Q70. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M31s has a more recent 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
The Galaxy M31s counts with a little faster CPU than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy M31s also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M31s features a bit better display than LG Q70, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit larger screen.
The LG Q70 features a bit more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M31s takes much clearer photos and videos than LG Q70, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M31s also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy M31s features a way better battery lifetime than LG Q70, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.