Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s has a general score of 88, which is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's general score of 81.2. Galaxy M31s is a newer phone than the LG V40 ThinQ, but it is thicker and heavier. These devices include Android OS, but Galaxy M31s has a more recent 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and performance enhancements.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher display pixels density. The LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Galaxy M31s. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy M31s has a way better battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. Galaxy M31s counts with a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in poorly lited situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a way larger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.