Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s is slightly better than LG V60 ThinQ, having a overall score of 88 against 87.6. Galaxy M31s's construction is just a bit lighter but a little bit thicker than LG V60 ThinQ, and they were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS, so both should provide you all the same operating system features.
LG V60 ThinQ has a screen that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy M31s's screen, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a quite larger display. The LG V60 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy M31s has superior battery lifetime than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a 20 percent larger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M31s takes much better photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ. Both of them have a same size aperture, the same resolution back facing camera, the same sensor size, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.