Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a score of 88 against 83.4. Even being the best phone we compare here, Samsung Galaxy M31s's construction is way older, a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M31s has 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 50 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a way better video resolution and a bigger sensor capturing better quality photographs.
Galaxy M31s counts with a little bit better storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M31s counts with improved battery performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 30 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.