Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s is better than the Moto G Power, with a score of 88 against 76.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy M31s and Moto G Power were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy M31s design is just a little heavier but a little thinner than Moto G Power. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Galaxy M31s features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a quite bigger display. Samsung Galaxy M31s has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s takes greater videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also counts with a lot larger sensor and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy M31s counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy M31s also has more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M31s features longer battery performance than Moto G Power, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.