Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-06 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, having an 88 score against 75.8. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy M31s has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Galaxy M31s body is way newer, but somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force.
Moto Z Force counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy M31s has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Moto Z Force counts with a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M31s counts with a very superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s captures way better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video quality, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.