Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-06 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s has an overall score of 88, which is much better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's global score of 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy M31s construction is incredibly newer than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, although it's heavier and noticeably thicker. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a little sharper display than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Galaxy M31s features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy M31s counts with a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M31s also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M31s, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M31s counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 71% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.