Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-06 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s has a general score of 88, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. The Galaxy M31s is a notably newer cellphone than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it is noticeably thicker and noticeably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy M31s and the Moto Z2 Force Edition count with quite similar processors, and although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per display inch. Galaxy M31s captures much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M31s also has a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a back camera with a much better resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M31s features a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.