Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-06 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s has an overall score of 88, which is better than Moto Z2 Play's score of 77.4. Galaxy M31s is a way newer device than the Moto Z2 Play, although it's heavier and extremely thicker. The Galaxy M31s counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bigger display, a quite better screen pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M31s has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy M31s counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy M31s shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.