Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s has a score of 88, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 general score. These devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M31s has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, giving some nice extra features. Even though Samsung Galaxy M31s and the OPPO Find X2 Pro were released only 3 months apart, Samsung Galaxy M31s's construction is just a little bit lighter but a little bit thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Pro.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because it has a little bigger screen, more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy M31s, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy M31s features a superior battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 41 percent greater battery size.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a camera that's very similar to Galaxy M31s's camera, because although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a lower video definition and a back camera with way less megapixels, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments and a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.