Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-06 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M31s's 88 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a thinner and a little bit lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy M31s, even when they were released with only a couple of months difference. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a screen that is just as good as Galaxy M31s's display, both of them have the same amount of pixels in each inch of display, a same size display and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy M31s counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM.
Galaxy M31s counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. Samsung Galaxy A52 and Samsung Galaxy M31s both count with incredibly similar cameras, both of them have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size camera aperture, the same (4K) video resolution, a same resolution back-facing camera and a 0.59 inches sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.