Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M31s's 88 overall score. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M31s has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy S22's design is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M31s.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S22 features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy M31s counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.