Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M31s, getting a 95.4 score against 88. These phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Samsung Galaxy M31s has Android 11 version. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer and just a little bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy M31s.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a processor that is very similar to the CPU in Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because it has a little bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a just a little higher display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a camera with a way better 108 MP resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M31s has better battery life than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 20 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.