Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-06 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, getting an 88 score against 80.2. Even though the Galaxy M31s is newer than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy M31s has a more recent 11 version and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10, providing you some extra features and performance improvements.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a display that's very similar to Galaxy M31s's screen, and although the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a quite worse screen density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, they both have a display with the same size.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M31s, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M31s features just a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Galaxy M31s features a superior battery duration than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.