Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 has a score of 85, which is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 global score. Even though the Galaxy M40 and the LG V50 ThinQ were only released 1 months apart, the Galaxy M40 is just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M40. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy M40, because it has a little bigger screen, a better number of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with just a bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, worse video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 32 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.