Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 has a global score of 85, which is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro's score of 78.8. These devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy M40 has an older 10 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11. Galaxy M40 is an older and just a little thicker phone than vivo X60 Pro, but Samsung could make it a little bit lighter anyway.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a quite inferior pixels quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px.
The vivo X60 Pro captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a much bigger back camera sensor and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy M40 has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The vivo X60 Pro counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy M40, because it has a 20% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.