Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is just a bit better than Google Nexus 6P, getting an 87.7 score against 80.3. The Galaxy M51 construction is a lot newer, but much thicker and somewhat heavier than the Google Nexus 6P. Samsung Galaxy M51 has just a bit better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Nexus 6P has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixels density. Galaxy M51 captures greater videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy M51 also has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy M51 has a much better storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy M51 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 has a very superior battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.