Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 2's 81.6 score. Galaxy M51's design is newer, but somewhat thicker and extremely heavier than Google Pixel 2. Google Pixel 2's processing unit is very similar to Samsung Galaxy M51's processing unit, and although the Google Pixel 2 has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a little better quantity of pixels in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M51 takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.