Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is much better than the LG V20's global score of 77. Samsung Galaxy M51's design is notably newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than LG V20. The LG V20 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels number per inch of display.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more cores. The Samsung Galaxy M51 captures way better pictures and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better resolution back camera.
LG V20 has slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.