Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is better than LG V30, getting an 87.7 score against 79.1. Galaxy M51's body is way newer than the LG V30's, although it is a lot heavier and notably thicker. LG V30 has a little bit better screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M51, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V30 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy M51, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy M51 captures much better photographs and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos and a lot more megapixels camera.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.