Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ, having an 87.7 score against 83.7. Although Galaxy M51 is newer than LG V50 ThinQ, it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both should give very similar operating system features.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a little better processing power than Galaxy M51. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M51 shoots much better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting way better quality photos and a lot more MP back facing camera.
LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 75% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.