Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a score of 87.7 against 76.4. Samsung Galaxy M51's design is newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola Droid Turbo features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher amount of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a lot better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution, a larger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations and higher video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.