Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo's general score of 77.9. The Galaxy M51 construction is noticeably newer and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it's also somewhat heavier. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit superior processor than Galaxy M51, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater display density.
The Galaxy M51 captures much better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M51 also has a larger diafragm aperture, better video frame rates and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The Galaxy M51 counts with much more memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.