Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is better than the Moto G Stylus's 79.7 overall score. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. Although it's the best we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy M51 design is a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Moto G Stylus.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a higher amount of RAM. Moto G Stylus has a display that is very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy M51, because although the Moto G Stylus has a quite lower 1080 x 2300 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy M51 has a slightly better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a camera with a much better resolution.
The Moto G Stylus features as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as the Galaxy M51 one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.