Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-11 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and White | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is better than the Motorola Moto Z4, having an 87.7 score against 79.8. Galaxy M51's construction is newer, but a lot thicker and a lot heavier than Motorola Moto Z4. Both devices in our current comparison use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so they should offer identical OS features.
Samsung Galaxy M51 features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has more RAM. Moto Z4 has a screen that is just as good as Galaxy M51's display, because although the Moto Z4 has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Moto Z4's memory capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as Galaxy M51's one, they have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage. Galaxy M51 has a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.