Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-09-11 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. Galaxy M51's body is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it is somewhat heavier and much thicker. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Galaxy M51 counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little higher pixel number in each screen inch, a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM.
The Galaxy M51 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a way more megapixels camera. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much better battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.