Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-11 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 overall score. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy M51 design is thicker and heavier than the vivo X60 Pro. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Galaxy M51 has older 10 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a quite greater display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 has a way better battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M51 takes clearer pictures and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a larger sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.