Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-11 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, having a general score of 87.7 against 85.5. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, although it is a little thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2246 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy M51 takes much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy M51 features a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.