Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-07 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is better than the Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, with an 85 score against 76.7. Apple iPhone 8's body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, but it is lighter. The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, although it has a little bit worse screen density, a way lower 750 x 1334 resolution and a really smaller screen.
Apple iPhone 8 features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M53 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. IPhone 8 has a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Samsung Galaxy M53 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has a way tinier camera sensor taking lot lower quality images and videos, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M53 5G also counts with a back camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy M53 5G features a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 175% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.