Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-04-07 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is much better than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, with an 87.1 score against 76.7. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy Note9 is an extremely older, heavier and somewhat thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G. Galaxy Note9 features a brighter screen than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a lot better processing power than Galaxy M53 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has better battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M53 5G takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a much smaller sensor which offers a lot lower image and video quality and a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.