Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note
16 GB| Global Score | |
| 67.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 4.0.3, 2.3.5, 2.3.4 | -- |
| 2011-09-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.78 x 3.27 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 252.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 800 x 1280 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 960 hours standby time 26 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a lot better than the Galaxy Note's 67.5 overall score. Although LG Velvet is just a little heavier than Galaxy Note, it's thinner and newer. LG Velvet has a screen that's just as good as the display in Galaxy Note, although the LG Velvet also has a greater screen pixels density, a larger screen and a much better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note, because it has 112 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
LG Velvet captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note, because it has a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light situations, a lot better video definition and a much more mega pixels back facing camera. The LG Velvet has a superior battery life than Galaxy Note, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2500mAh.
The LG Velvet costs a bit more than Galaxy Note, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.