Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than Google Pixel 2's global score of 81.6. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is newer, but much heavier and just a bit thicker than Google Pixel 2. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a lot larger screen, a just a little better screen pixels density and a much higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better video quality, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 2, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.