Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Google Pixel XL, getting a 98.9 score against 81.3. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is noticeably newer and a little thinner than Google Pixel XL's, but it is heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 8 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a bigger screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better camera than Google Pixel XL, because it has a much better video resolution, a much more megapixels back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture and a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel XL, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.