Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 8.89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-10-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T860 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 11.76, which is a lot better than the HTC Desire 10 pro's global score of 8.89. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is notably newer than HTC Desire 10 pro's, but it is noticeably heavier and just a little bit thicker. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 11 version and HTC Desire 10 pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more vivid display than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a little bit more pixels per display inch, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better hardware performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures way better pictures and videos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures, a much better resolution back camera and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery duration than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.