Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than LG V20's 77 global score. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a notably newer cellphone than the LG V20, but it's somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior processor than LG V20, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than LG V20, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than LG V20, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a much bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much longer battery life than LG V20, because it has a 41 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG V20, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.