Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the LG V30, getting a 98.9 score against 79.1. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is noticeably newer than the LG V30's, although it is a lot heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more powerful processor than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and LG V30 count with extremely similar displays, because although the LG V30 has a little smaller display and a quite lower 1440 x 2880 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels number per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than LG V30, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has longer battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing way better quality photographs, a way higher video resolution and a camera with much more MP.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V30. If you want to save some money, you can get the LG V30, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.