Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than the LG V50 ThinQ's global score of 83.7. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is somewhat heavier than LG V50 ThinQ, it's just a little thinner and also newer. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, so it gives some nice extra features and improved performance.
The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density and a slightly better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better processing power than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures way better pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera, a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a much better video resolution.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V50 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can get the LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.