Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having a overall score of 11.76 against 9.6. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a much newer and thinner device than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it is also somewhat heavier. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixel density.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
