Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Motorola Edge 50, having a overall score of 98.9 against 81.2. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Despite being the best in this review, it must be told that it is also an extremely older, a bit thicker and heavier cellphone.
Motorola Edge 50 features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a little worse resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a quite smaller display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better camera than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way higher video definition, a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.