Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Moto G51 5G, having a score of 98.9 against 77.8. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Moto G51 5G has Android 11 version, providing the user a lot of extra features. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body weights the same than Moto G51 5G, but it's somewhat thinner.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better processing power than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little sharper screen than Moto G51 5G, because it has a little larger screen, a better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better camera than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back facing camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G51 5G, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Moto G51 5G has a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.