Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 10.02 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Moto G60s, with a global score of 11.76 against 10.02. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G60s. Both devices in this review include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better screen than Moto G60s, because it has a better pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a quite bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better processing power than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto G60s features a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto G60s also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a way higher video quality.
Motorola Moto G60s counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.